"-" replacement
- lafactory.com
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 9 months ago #1014
by lafactory.com
right... I did something wrong :
I tried again and yes, it works now ;D
thanks
It IS possible. As I said use URL replacements:
-=>whatever_you_want
It is working, if not - you are doing something wrong.
right... I did something wrong :

thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- netfly
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 9 months ago #1017
by netfly
I recommend you don't use underscore to separate words since google will consider only one word.
For example:
red-car (2 words)
red~car (2 words)
red_car (only one word)
For example:
red-car (2 words)
red~car (2 words)
red_car (only one word)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Saka
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
17 years 9 months ago #1018
by Saka
Emir Sakic
www.sakic.net
On the other hand "co-existance" is one word. So the URL replacement "co_existance" seems appropriate in this case.
Emir Sakic
www.sakic.net
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- lafactory.com
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 9 months ago #1019
by lafactory.com
the problem is that I am too good ;D I use "-" for years directly hardcoded in my titles.
btw, this "-" instead of "_" is overrated.
I recommend you don't use underscore to separate words since google will consider only one word.
the problem is that I am too good ;D I use "-" for years directly hardcoded in my titles.
btw, this "-" instead of "_" is overrated.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- netfly
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 9 months ago #1021
by netfly
In this specific case yes, for sure
On the other hand "co-existance" is one word. So the URL replacement "co_existance" seems appropriate in this case.
In this specific case yes, for sure

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- GabyZ
-
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 9 months ago #1022
by GabyZ
I think that there's a problem with the replacement, the old urls are indexed with '%11', google will find new urls with '_' but the old urls with '%11' are not 301 redirected to the new with '_', so this could be considered duplicate content.
How we can add the 301 redirect?
How we can add the 301 redirect?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.